Common value


Mutual transparency of intentions in conflicts


The Court of Peace creates the consent of the participants to resolve the conflict by mutual agreement.

The presented application allows negotiating an agreement in the field of:

Protected entity, protected value, purpose, ways of achieving the goal.

The application starts by registering a new case. Detailed instructions follow.

Office / Sentence / example

Sentence Protected entity Protected value / common good The purpose of the court. A useful result in protecting the good of common. The method is effective in achieving the indicated goal
2020-09-11 x x x x
Expiration date

Instruction

Protection - care, repair, rescue.

The essence of the case - purpose of social action / the causes of the conflict.

Sentence - entity protected, what values, for what purpose, in what ways.

Agreement - consent to the text of the operative part.

Aim - a useful result from the team's case.


Rules for showing aim to others

1. Appointed to others sincerely within the limits of the common good

2. Formulated briefly, clearly, unambiguously, in one sentence

3. Achievable, not yet implemented

4. The goal indicates the value, method of action

5. Objectives and methods must not be contradictory

6. Goals earlier, ways later

7. Ability to control implementation

8. Connects contradictions

9. Added value

The conflict is resolved by Initiator and Invited.

The mediator and manager help in removing communication barriers.

Registration - performed by the Initiator.

Registration is limited to the selection of the case key and the choice of data lifetime.

Logging in to the case and for editing.

Logging in to the case with a key.

Login to edition with a password. Temporary passwords are randomized by the Initiator.

The initiator is a security leader, draws passwords, specifies the subject of the case, provides the case key and temporary passwords to the Invited, Mediator or Manager.

The choice of the subject matter is limited to three options: care / repair / rescue.

The goals / causes of the conflict (the essence of the matter) and the sentence (the idea of protection) are negotiated

In the event of disagreement, the manager presents the cause of the conflict and the sentence.

The essence of the case


Purpose of Social Action

The causes of the conflict

Result



In the proposed method of conflict resolution, the term "case" refers to a social relationship.

In social action, everyone can have their own goals.

Goals can be variable, with an infinite number of variable features - true, false, right, wrong, concordant, contradictory, overt, hidden, etc.

When there is even a minimal will to agree, let the goals of the participants be the essence.

When consent is impossible, let the essence of the case be the causes of the conflict.

After the proceedings are over, let the essence of the matter be the result.

Criteria for diagnosis
Intentions, the essence of the matter in a wider context. The idea of protection in the case. Entity protection Protection value Purpose of Social Action Ways
Who presents the intentions Initiator (project) Invited (project) Manager (sentence)
Consent to the draft sentence / sentence Complete agreement, identification Distance, lack of recognition Partial consent to the sentence
Consent to negotiate the sentence Yes No
State of openness of intentions Revealed: entity protection, value, effect, ways Hidden. No information available to identify the intent transparency of intentions mixed
Management Recognition of Intentions Recognition Unrecognized partially recognized
Goal implementation status Designed goal Realized Achieved
State of consciousness Conscious action Unscionsciously Insanity
The rightness of action Justified No justification Partially justified
Honesty Goodwill, real motives and goals Manipulation, false information, hidden appeals, contempt for the principles of setting goals Mixed honesty
Usefulness Personal interest Good of common Utility empty
Verification of will

Before achieving the goal

1. Who is the initiator of the matter, who is in protection?

2. In what conditions will the harm not be reported?

3. For what reason is agreement of the parties not possible?

4. With what useful result it is to force a certain behavior?

After achieving the goal

5. Is the one who was supposed to be protected satisfied with the result of protection?

6. Has the repair been carried out?

7. Have the causes of the conflict been removed?

8. Was the means of forcing behavior as agreed?